| LINKS | |
| | Slide 1 |
| | Slide 2 |
| | Slide 3 |
| | Slide 4 |
| | Slide 5 |
| | Slide 6 |
| | Slide 7 |
| | Slide 8 |
| | Slide 9 |
| | Slide 10 |
| | Slide 11 |
| | Slide 12 |
| | Slide 13 |
| | Slide 14 |
| | Slide 15 |
| | Slide 16 |
| | Slide 17 |
| | Slide 18 |
| | Slide 19 |
| | Slide 20 |
| | Slide 21 |
| | Slide 22 |
| | Slide 23 |
| | Slide 24 |
| | Slide 25 |
| | Slide 26 |
| | Slide 27 |
| | Slide 28 |
| | Slide 29 |
| | Slide 30 |
| | Slide 31 |
| Return to Sensors | |
Capacitive Proximity Sensors |
||
|
|
True or False: An inductive prox is for sensing metal, and a capacitive prox is for sensing everything else. It's correct in spirit, but technically it is not true on two points. One, capacitive switches are great at sensing metal. Why? Because metal has high dialectric constant. Since inductive prox sensors cost less, capacitive switches are only used to sense metal is special applications, such as wire-break detection, which would be difficult for photo eyes. But they can sense metal quite well. Secondly, capacitive switches certainly do not "sense everything else". There are a lot of materials other than metal which do not have good dialectric constant. Therefore, they are poor targets for capacitive switches. If it weren't for that, however, they would not be near so useful.
Capacitive prox switches are great for fill/no fill applications, in
fact, for that very reason. Many products, like wood products or many
plastics, have a very low dialectric constant rating and make poor capacitive
targets. These products are often used to -make containers such as bottles
or cardboard boxes. |
|
|
||