| LINKS | |
| | Slide 1 |
| | Slide 2 |
| | Slide 3 |
| | Slide 4 |
| | Slide 5 |
| | Slide 6 |
| | Slide 7 |
| | Slide 8 |
| | Slide 9 |
| | Slide 10 |
| | Slide 11 |
| | Slide 12 |
| | Slide 13 |
| | Slide 14 |
| | Slide 15 |
| | Slide 16 |
| | Slide 17 |
| | Slide 18 |
| | Slide 19 |
| | Slide 20 |
| | Slide 21 |
| | Slide 22 |
| | Slide 23 |
| | Slide 24 |
| | Slide 25 |
| | Slide 26 |
| | Slide 27 |
| | Slide 28 |
| | Slide 29 |
| | Slide 30 |
| | Slide 31 |
| Return to Sensors | |
Inductive Proximity Switch: Recap |
|
|
|
No. 1 Choice So, what we've learned so far is this: If you can use an inductive prox switch to solve your application, do it. And what two conditions must exist to qualify? One, your target must be metal. And two, you've got to sense your metal target at close range. While that sounds restrictive, an enormous number of applications can be solved this way. Recap: They're relatively inexpensive, when compared to most other sensor types. They work fine in nasty environments. There isn't much to setting them up. They are immune to the variables like color and lighting that plague photo eyes. They're very fast and reliable. Moving On: Inductive proxmity sensors. They are the number one choice. Use them
if you can. But if your target isn't metal, you can't use them.
|